meyers456: How &39;bout a government run health plan that is REQUIRED to charge the same rate as private insurance?

Dienstag, 30. November 2010

How &39;bout a government run health plan that is REQUIRED to charge the same rate as private insurance?

How'bout a government run health plan that is REQUIRED to charge the same rate as private insurance?
That would be fair competition.
That would make it so that corporations had no incentive to drop their current health plans.
That would be fair competition.
We do like fair competition, don't we? Maybe the government would have to charge 4% more than private plans.
Then corporations would have an incentive not to switch to the public plan.
Wouldn't that be a good idea?
The extra money could be used to subsidize those that cannot afford health insurance. Keep in mind, suppose you live in Canada.
And you want to purchase a Honda.
You can get one made in Japan, where there is universal health insurance.
Or you can get one made in the US, where the cost of worker insurance is tacked onto the price.
Which are you going to choose? If you want to make the US more competitive in the world market, then you should demand universal health insurance.
If you want US corporations to be more profitable, you should demand universal health insurance. If you want to live longer, then you should demand universal health insurance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy Notice that all of the major industrialized countries have longer life expectancies than the US.
EVERY SINGLE ONE.
That's what you should have a problem with.
If the country that has the best health care in the world, also has the shortest life expectancy, you should demand a change.
And that change is to move to universal health coverage. If not for you, do it for your kids.
Take an average. That's just high school math. �"Maybe the government would have to charge 4% more than private plans. The extra money could be used to subsidize those that cannot afford health insurance." (maybe read the whole question?)It would actually serve a very good purpose. A very sad fact is that way too many Americans seem to think that "SALE" is a religious objective. If something is cheaper, that's better.
Consider, if preventive health care were required, health expenses would significantly decline. But we're not smart enough to do that. "Never pay today what you can put off until tomorrow." Even if it'll cost far more tomorrow. Other industrialized countries achieve longer life exectancies by spending wisely, not by spending more. They practice preventitive medicine. That's what the government plan would do. That's why some people would pay more -- to live longer, and more healthy. I would.
Answer :
Works for me.
Source : http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=20090909181846AAxeN3W

Related to universal health insurance :

Urban Dictionary: healthcare
... private everything else) American insurance companies and pharmaceutical co... The USA is the only developed country not to implement universal health care. ...

Universal health care - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
... universal health care system by mandating that residents purchase health ... where there is private insurance and universal health care, such as Germany, ...